What Is Gothic Fiction?

Image by fluffy_steve

Image by Grufnik

Image by Joey Orso

I’ve decided to continue my trend of analyzing, defining, and explaining literary genres by illuminating one of my favorite and often-misunderstood genres; gothic fiction.

So what is gothic fiction? Let’s start at the very beginning…

Gothic History

The Goths were a Germanic tribe that battled the Roman Empire for centuries and played a large role in shaping Medieval Europe as well as the English language as we know it. You might assume that “gothic architecture” came from these people, but you’d be wrong. During the Renaissance, people began to rediscover Greco-Roman architecture. They called it “gothic” not because it was the building of the Goths, but because they considered it “barbaric” like said tribe. The name stuck.

Gothic Fiction

Now we get to fiction. The gothic novel began around 1780 and grew in popularity and established itself as a genre into the 1800’s. The genre came to be called “gothic” because so many of these books took place in castles, abbeys, mansions, and other buildings of the gothic architectural style (which wasn’t really Gothic; how’s that for convoluted?).

Of course, setting a book in a gothic building isn’t enough to make the book gothic. Gothic literature became trendy enough to become its own genre, and like all genres, it established its own set of staples, messages, and tropes. At its very root, gothic fiction is a blend of romance and horror. Love and fear. Beauty and grotesquerie. It uses this contrast to heighten each.

If we focus on this juxtaposition, many of the gothic staples become quite obvious: the beautiful maiden, locked away by a villain; the exquisite old mansion, now in ruins; the touching love story, shattered by dark secrets. This constant contrast of the darkest and most lovely elements lends the works an exquisite sense of drama that often borders on melodrama, which in turn opens up the genre to parody of all scopes and intents – another common feature of gothic literature.

The final staples of the genre are atmosphere and setting. These are often utilized to such a degree that they cause a minimization of character. The protagonists in gothic novels might be nondescript, but the atmosphere is a pervasive sense of dread so thick you could walk on it. Gothic setting goes back to the genre’s roots in architecture. In early gothic novels, the buildings are intensely–you guessed it–atmospheric. The choice of using once-splendid buildings that are now crumpled in rot and decay is often believed to be a commentary on the state of society.

Contemporary gothic novels don’t have to use gothic architecture, but they do uphold this tradition of settings so vivid they become not just an atmosphere but an entire character. If you remove the setting of a gothic novel, the atmosphere disappears and the story disintegrates. Thus “southern gothic” makes such use of its southern setting that it permeates every aspect of the novel; contemporary gothic does the same with more modern locations, and so on.

Along with staples, there are tropes. Tropes are not necessary, but are great ways to help readers recognize when what they’re reading is gothic. Common gothic tropes include: the virginal maiden held against her will, the oppressively evil villain, ghosts (both real and perceived), incest (both real and perceived), thugs/bandoliers/other gangs of bad guys, members of the cloth (both corrupt and holy), prophecies, omens, and other inescapable futures inherited from the past, the supernatural (both real and perceived), skeletons, locked and hidden doors and passageways, mystery, and – of course – forbidden love.

Just for fun, let’s take a look at one of my favorite examples: Carrie Ryan’s YA zombie novel The Forest of Hands and Teeth. Bet you thought it was a regular old dystopian horror novel, didn’t you? I happen to believe it’s a gothic novel disguised as a zombie novel. Let’s break it down. [WARNING: Some mild spoilers ahead.]

  • horror: Mary’s village lives in constant fear of the Unconsecrated (zombies) breaching their fences.
  • romance: Mary is in love with Travis.
  • drama/melodrama: Love quadrangle; complications.
  • vivid atmosphere: The Guardians, the Sisterhood, the Unconsecrated, the Forest of Hands and Teeth… you might be able to guess that the atmosphere is overwhelmingly vivid.
  • setting as character: Check. The village, the pathways, the forest… all striking. The book would fall apart without this setting.
  • the virginal maiden held against her will: Mary is trapped in her small town–literally fenced in.
  • members of the cloth: The Sisterhood, implied descendants of nuns, is the dominant authority.
  • bands of bad guys: The Guardians keep all zombies out… or are they keeping the villagers in check?
  • inescapable inheritance: Mary is obsessed with her mother’s oral history of the world before the apocalypse, including rumors of the ocean beyond the forest.
  • the supernatural: Zombies!
  • locked doors, secrets: The Sisterhood seems to hold the truth about the world before, but won’t tell.
  • architecture: The ruined tower that Mary visits to get away.
  • a mystery: The fences around the town branch off into two fenced-in pathways. Where do they lead? No one knows. Mary wants to find out.
  • forbidden love: Although Mary loves Travis, he won’t marry her because his brother is in love with her.
  • ruins and decay: The zombies are literally decaying and the tower is literally in ruins, but more importantly, when you look at it this way, the gothic message of the deterioration of society is only a hop, skip, and a jump away from dystopia, isn’t it?

Have I convinced you yet? We can do the same game with Rebecca, Wuthering Heights, Flowers in the Attic

Gothic as a Euphemism for Horror

As I’ve covered before, the horror genre as we know it today blossomed from gothic fiction. The fact that said subgenre actually gained enough popularity to become the dominant genre creates an interesting peculiarity: “gothic fiction” is now often considered a subgenre of “horror,” even though it was originally the parent genre.

The fact that horror has roots in gothic fiction does indeed blur some lines. And perhaps because horror as a genre struggles with literary credibility, “gothic” has become a euphemism for “horror.” If book sellers are afraid that marketing a novel as “horror” will chase away potential readers, “gothic” sounds softer and is generally a less-stigmatized word. Likewise, many closeted horror fans will call their favorite horror novels “gothic novels” to imply quality or literary merit that others don’t believe horror can obtain.

As a writer who is actively involved in both horror and gothic fiction, this drives me absolutely crazy, but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s true. Stephen King novels, for example, are often called “gothic fiction” by readers who don’t want to be associated with blood and gore, but King quite simply doesn’t write gothic literature; he writes horror. (There might be some exceptions, perhaps Bag of Bones, but it’s been too long since I’ve read it to be certain. ‘Salem’s Lot, for example, is not gothic; it’s straight horror. The fact that it’s good and has some real value doesn’t change that.)

Unfortunately, this use of gothic as a euphemism for horror confuses the terminology for the casual reader, making it harder for horror to gain respect as well as making it more difficult to hunt down authentically gothic novels.

Note: It’s also worth mentioning that gothic, as a combination of horror and romance, has also had great ‘spin-off’ success in using predominantly horror or predominantly romance. Thus we hear books categorized as “gothic romance” or “gothic horror.” Generally what you can expect from these subgenres is a healthy dose of gothic style and themes, but leaning more heavily toward either a love story or the scares.

Goth Subculture

Others know of “gothic” as a way to describe a certain clique in high schools everywhere. This subculture of black clothes, shocking makeup, and moody music does take inspiration from gothic literature, as well as from the subsequent emergence of the horror genre. The strongest tie here is to the concept of romance mixed with horror, so many “goths” play with mixing beauty and startling imagery, whether in their personal style or artistic tastes. A good example would be clothes styled after ornate Victorian frocks, contrasted with “hard” things like safety pins, piercings, and tattoos.

Other Gothic Art

And of course, fiction wasn’t the only art form to get in on the strange and convoluted history of gothicism. At the same time that gothic architecture was gaining steam, a sister-style of art blossomed as well, which can be seen showcased in and often intertwined with gothic architecture in the form of stained glass, sculpture, and fresco. And as with gothic fiction, this style of art evolved and is often referenced in what you’ll hear called “modern gothic,” which picks and chooses which elements of the genre it wants to use and comment on–as does much “modern gothic” literature today.


There you have it: the long, complex, and multi-faceted breakdown of what gothic means. When you know a little history and accept that the same word means different things to different fields (art, history, architecture, fiction, culture…), it becomes clear that these are actually many things connected by a very thin thread. Hopefully I’ve helped you follow that thread to a better understanding of gothic fiction.

And how about that Forest of Hands and Teeth, huh? What’s a novel you’ve read that you now recognize as gothic fiction in disguise?

Like this post? Check out all posts in the What is Genre? series!

Posted in Genres, Horror | Tagged | 36 Comments

October in Review: Links, Treats, and Nary a Trick in Sight

Lots of spooky and wonderful things have been happening this October, but it’s not over yet! You have just enough time left before Halloween to browse through some of my favorite links this month.

The Horror Writers Association (the professional organization I’m a member of) put on another great “Halloween Haunts” blog series this year. Many HWA members pitched in with memories, discussions, and goody giveaways. It’s not too late to send in your info/comment on posts to be entered to win!

In the spirit of the season, I doodled this little guy for you.

In the spirit of the season, I doodled this little guy for you.

To start with you can read my post, “Reclaiming Horror,” right here. It takes a look at why horror as a book genre is in trouble and what we can do to fix it. Even if you’re not a fan of horror, I hope you’ll find it thoughtful and worth a read.

Two different horror novel boxed sets came out, pretty enough to make me drool on my keyboard: Jonathan Maberry’s now-complete YA zombie quartet and a Penguin Horror Classics set cherry-picked by Guillermo del Toro.

James Chambers wrote a beautiful nostalgic post to kick off Halloween Haunts: “The Old Stories Return.”

Carol MacAllister’s poem “A Demon’s Treat” (at the bottom of this post) made me smile!

Greg McWhorter recommended some alternative tunes to spice up your Halloween playlist.

On Twitter, Ellen Datlow drew my attention to this list of women writing excellent horror fiction at SF Signal.

This awesome article/photo set is of a dubiously true but undoubtedly spooky lake.

Here on my blog I set up some “Spook Packages” of suggested horror viewing/reading for every taste.

Heather L Reid gave a compelling explanation for why she began writing dark fiction (and loving all things Halloween) in her post “Night Terrors.”

Bram Stoker Award-winner Marge Simon was interviewed for Halloween Haunts, and shared a few poems.

Melissa Crytzer Fry always posts great nature photography blogs, but her one about bats is my fave!

Diann Daniel got to go see Stephen King speak (jealous), and was kind enough to share with us what she learned in her post “Four Writing Lessons I Learned from Listening to Stephen King.”

Lisa Morton gave a pretty cool summary of the actual history of Halloween for HWA’s Halloween Haunts. Hint: it’s not what you thought it was.

Matthew Warner gave a hilarious look at one child’s destiny to become a goblin… as interpreted through his artwork in “That’s My Boy.”

Lucy Snyder answered interview questions about her Bram Stoker award-winning horror story “Magdala Amygdala,” which I loved.

LitReactor introduced me to several of the latest additions to my Horror To-Watch list with ‘Ten Exceptionally Well-Written Horror Films.”

BookPage posted “13 of the year’s creepiest books.” I wants.

John Palisano passionately urged horror writers to write their hearts in “Opening the Vein.”

I reminisced about Halloweens and Octobers past here in “The Things a Picture Holds.”

Brian Taylor brought up the blessing/curse of all horror writers in “Horror Means…Stephen King?” And he’s right. I mean seriously, there are other authors.

I think my doppelganger is writing guest posts under another name again… “Scary Stories To Tell In the Dark: A Case for Scaring the Crap Out of Your Kids.” (Okay, okay. Maybe it was John Jarzemsky at LitReactor.)

Welcome to the Neighborhood” by Yvonne Navarro is a charming recounting of one woman’s first Halloween at a busy trick-or-treat spot. Dog costume included.

LitReactor columnist Robbie Blair posted this thoughtful and fascinating post: “The Uncanny Factor: Why Little Girls Scare the Shit Out of Us.”

I love recommendations! Brian Taylor gives us some more with “My Five Must Watch Horror Movies for Halloween.”

Author Robin Wasserman talks about Stephen King and teen audiences in this incredibly thought-provoking post at The Atlantic: “Stephen King Saved My Life.”

Thinking about trying your hand at this spooky stuff? The Writer’s Digest shop put up a bundle for “Writing Horror & Paranormal Novels.”

And if you STILL haven’t gotten your fill (you greedy goblins, you), you can even browse my links roundup from last October. And as always, you can get your chills at my creeptastically beautiful tumblr.

If I’ve missed something great, feel free to share in the comments!

Happy hauntings!

Posted in Horror | Tagged | 14 Comments

Reclaiming Horror at HWA

This year the Horror Writers Association has once again decided to honor the season with their month-long blog series, Halloween Haunts. Today my post is up, so instead of putting a new blog here this week, I’m inviting you all to visit me there, especially since this topic is so near and dear to my heart.

Plus, if you leave a comment on my post you’ll be entered to win a copy of the Ghostgirl series by Tonya Hurley plus a tote and t-shirt. Awesome! Thanks Tonya!

My post is called “Reclaiming Horror.” It’s about the state of horror fiction in today’s book market, the problems I see, and the ways I think we can fix them. You do not have to be a fan of horror to read this post. In fact, I would especially invite those less familiar or comfortable with the genre to give it a read.

And if you’re here visiting from Halloween Haunts, welcome! Comments will be closed on this post, but please feel free to check out my most recent post about Halloween as well as the “horror” category of my archives. Thank you so much for stopping by!

I hope to see you all over at the HWA blog. And while you’re there, you might take some time to browse the other posts this month. There have been many excellent pieces by HWA members, and many posts include giveaways for commenting.

Thanks guys!

Annie

Posted in Horror | Leave a comment

My Halloween Recommendations: Spook Packages

October is here, which means the time is nigh. Halloween has begun to cast its spell, and if you’re like me, your entertainment tastes begin veering toward the spooky. (Okay, even more than usual.) People are always asking me for recommendations – which I love – so I thought I’d put together some “packages” for various tastes. Obviously, these are recommended packages. I’m not actually selling anything. I’m afraid you’ll have to track these down on your own, which is why I’m posting this early. You still have plenty of time to get your claws hands on these before the big night!

Each package includes a novel, movie, short story, and poem. As much as possible, I chose pieces that I personally enjoyed. For a lovely build up to Halloween, I’d suggest starting the novel soon, reading the short story the week of Halloween, and then watching the movie and reading the poem aloud on Halloween night.

Photo by Nomadic Lass.

Mix and match to your liking. Or if you’re really ambitious, try them all!

The Classics Package

Not much of a horror buff? Or maybe you are and are just behind on catching up with the classics? I’ve got you covered.

novel: The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson

movie: Halloween, 1978 directed by John Carpenter

short story: “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” by Washington Irving

poem: “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe

bonus: Psycho (movie), 1960 directed by Alfred Hitchcock

Scary Package, for Dabblers

For those who truly like to be scared but are just starting out.

novel: The Shining by Stephen King

movie: The Exorcist, 1973 directed by William Friedkin

short story: “The Rats in the Walls” by H.P. Lovecraft

poem: “Scarcely Caged” by yours truly

bonus: ‘Salem’s Lot by Stephen King (novel)

Scary Package, for Connoisseurs

For those who truly like to be scared and have advanced tastes.

novel: House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

movie: Eraserhead, 1977 directed by David Lynch (I’m sorry.)

short story: “Some Pictures in an Album” by Gary McMahon

poem: “The Listeners” by Walter De La Mare

bonus: The Girl Next Door by Jack Ketchum (novel)

Family Night Package

Obviously, your mileage may vary based on the age of your kids and how easily they get nightmares. But in general, these are picks that are safe for most. And no kids required! I won’t tell if you won’t. 😉

novel: Rot & Ruin by Jonathan Maberry

movie: The Adam’s Family, 1991 directed by Barry Sonnenfeld

short story: “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe

poem: “Little Orphant Annie” by James Whitcomb Riley

bonus: Are You Afraid of the Dark? 1991-2000 created for Nickelodeon (TV show)

Zombie Package

Can’t get enough of the trendiest of undead? Brains galore.

novel: Blood Crazy by Simon Clark

movie: 28 Days Later, 2002 directed by Danny Boyle

short story: “Dead Song” by Jay Wilburn

poem: “To Walk Again” by yours truly

bonus: The Forest of Hands and Teeth by Carrie Ryan (novel)

Vampire Package

Prefer your undead pale and clever? Sink your fangs into these.

novel: I Am Legend by Richard Matheson

movie: The Lost Boys, 1987 directed by Joel Schumacher

short story: “The Vampyre” by John Polidori

poem: “Lamia” by John Keats

bonus: Interview with the Vampire by Anne Rice (novel)

~*~

There you have it. That should be enough good stuff to keep you looking over your shoulder through the 31st. Have your own recommendation to add? Please share in the comments!

Posted in Books & Movies | Tagged | 18 Comments

Thoughts on Lovecraft

I recently read a collection of H.P. Lovecraft’s short stories. My version was the Penguin Classics edition The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories. It was my introduction to Lovecraft, whom I had long heard of and had on my reading list but hadn’t gotten around to yet, even though he made my list of the Founding Fathers and Mothers of Horror Literature. I try to vary my reading quite a bit, which includes classics and staples and game-changers in my field, but I also try to keep up with current books succeeding in my genres as well as books of all styles, topics, and quality. In spite of the fact that I love modern fiction, literary fiction, and commercial fiction, old classics hold a special place in my heart and always will.

I still remember discovering Ray Bradbury. Like Lovecraft, Bradbury is an author I got to as an adult, and I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say he changed my life for the better. The quality and imagination and passion in his words flamed the fan of my own. Unlike Edgar Allan Poe, who I’ve loved since I was a little girl, I didn’t read Bradbury until I was well out of college. I mourned the years that I’d gone without Bradbury’s stories in my life. Think of how many times I could have read them – how many more I could have gotten to by now! But in a way, reading his work for the first time as an adult made it even more special. I was able to fully appreciate every layer and detail the first time through, and I instantly saw the influence in my beloved genres.

I wish I could say I had the same experience with Lovecraft, but I can’t. There are many factors here, so let me be clear: I very much enjoyed his stories. I adored his ideas and themes. I appreciate how original he was and acknowledge that he did indeed change the field. I was relieved to see that I was right in including him in my list of Founders of Horror. There were moments of brilliance. There were passages that made me pause in awe. There were stories that still stick with me several weeks later. And there were concepts that resonated deeply with some of my own work. I admire him. I do.

But I was still disappointed. Maybe it was the buildup. His short story “The Call of Cthulhu” is practically sacred among fans, and there have been so many Cthulhu mythos/Lovecraftian inspired anthologies I really don’t believe anyone could count them. Was “Cthulhu” good? Yes. Was it amazing? Maybe. Was it anywhere close to the mastery of Bradbury or Poe? Absolutely not.

When people talk about the masters of horror, they include Lovecraft, but the truth is that as incredibly original as his stories were for his time, they often lack drive and focus, the prose ranges from good to downright shoddy, and he repeats concepts to the point that they feel like over-chewed oatmeal. Even visionaries have their flaws, I suppose. But I see so many fewer flaws in Poe and Bradbury.

Maybe it’s not fair to compare them, but I can’t quite help it. I’m hard-pressed to find weak sentences in those two, much less entire passages, like in Lovecraft. And although Bradbury and Poe often repeat themes and messages, they rarely if ever repeat entire concepts the way Lovecraft does. And in spite of the fact that Poe comes from a time even earlier than Lovecraft (and was actually one of Lovecraft’s biggest literary influences), his stories never got quite so rambley and off-topic as Lovecraft’s do. Is originality and vision alone enough to warrant Lovecraft’s induction into the horror hall of fame?

Yeah, I guess it is. For those of you who haven’t read Lovecraft, I’ll do my best to give you an idea of his work. He mostly does science fictiony horror with a touch of supernatural. His outlook on humanity is bleak, and his fears focus on either an inescapable hereditary connection that will consume him eventually, or an inescapable cosmic terror coming for Earth… eventually. His fears, then, revolve around the past resurfacing to wipe him out or the future promising to wipe us all out. Put simply: evolution and aliens – often masterfully and sometimes clumsily combined into the same stories.

Untitled-2The predominate mood of his stories is dread. The main tone is despair. The fear is of the slow-build type, which is sometimes executed effectively and sometimes not. (He has a horrible habit of not just foreshadowing but blatantly stating where the story is going.) Most of his stories take place in a sort of backwoods, untouched New England. Main characters tend to be racist, classist, and of the scholarly perhaps even authorial type. There’s a recurring motif of cults with ancient, evil knowledge. Think cloaks and deformed people who don’t seem quite right. Lots of chanting. And an absolutely insane number of monoliths. I didn’t go back to check, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there was at least one mention of monoliths in every one of the 18 stories I read. Did I mention that dude is obsessed with monoliths?

I don’t think “Cthulhu” is his best story. Personally, I found “The Colour Out of Space” to be his finest. It’s by far the most unique, interesting, and subtly chilling alien horror story I’ve ever read. It makes “Cthulhu” look like hackneyed pulp in comparison, but I suppose that’s all a matter of taste. Another great story is “The Rats in the Walls,” which has all of the scientific/evolutionary/ancestry undercurrents of Lovecraft plus the chilling madness of Poe. Why don’t more people talk about these two?

Not that “The Call of Cthulhu” is bad by any means. I think the cult’s chanted phrase, which translates to, “In his house at R’lyeh dead Cthulhu waits dreaming,” is the most deliciously unsettling part of the story. I also liked the eerie statue, but when the actual monster appeared all of my tension and potential fear were gone. I’m not a big fan of giant alien monsters. Again, taste.

Perhaps my aversion to the repetitive concepts came because I read so many of his stories in a row. His early stories were frequently regurgitated and expanded upon in his later stories. For example, if you’ve read “Dagon” you pretty much know where “Cthulhu” is going. If you’ve read “The Festival” you don’t much need to read “Celephais,” etc. He also repeats many names of places and gods, such as Nyarlathotep and shoggoths. In fact, some characters and places are repeated so much that some people call the collected items the Cthulhu Mythos and claim that all of his works belong within one shared universe. I’m not convinced. To me they felt more like Easter eggs.

Perhaps if I’d read a smaller selection of Lovecraft before I became a writer I would have enjoyed his stories more. If I could have gotten over the mediocre prose and side-stepped the repetitive stories, I think I might have fallen in love. Although I’ve never been too into space horror, I adore evolutionary horror. Maybe a different set of circumstances could have had me revering Lovecraft as so much of the spec-fic fan world does, but as it is, I’m not in love. I came away with some new appreciation for my literary lineage, a healthy dose of respect, and an urge to crack open my old book of Poe.

Have you read Lovecraft? Did you love him, hate him, or something in between?

Posted in Authors | Tagged | 30 Comments