My Advice to Poets, Part II- Getting Out There

Originally posted on Wednesday, ‎May ‎11, ‎2011, ‏‎11:03:00 AM

Once you’ve gotten down steps 1 through 9 on Monday’s post

1. Start thinking of poetry as professional in addition to artistic.

If publication is where you want to go (see Part I, #1), you need to start thinking of poetry as a job and not just a hobby. This might sound stark in comparison to the beauty and creativity of composing poetry, but it’s a reality of the field. Just like with fiction and nonfiction, when you’re not actively writing (everything from editing to submitting), you need to put your business hat on. Poetry is an art, but it’s also a professional field. Give it that respect. Which means…

2. Format correctly.

Some people swear they have to write their poetry long-hand first. Or center-aligned. Or double-spaced. Fine. Write it that way. But after you finish it, make it standard formatting. You might rebel; you might think that standard formatting ruins the “art.” Get over it. If you’re going pro, you really need to use standard rules unless the deviation MEANS something crucial to the poem. Poetry is cryptic enough without leaving out all of your commas and capitalizing the first word of each line. Punctuate as you would prose. The goal here is clarity, not obscurity. Aside from that: 1” margins, 12 pt. Times New Roman, left justified, title bold or underlined, single spaced, black font, white paper, end of story.

3. Start entering contests.

Not all contests cost money. Use credible resources like Poet’s Market and Poets and Writers to track down contests that suit your work. After a few dozen entries, if you’re not winning or publishing anything, reevaluate your progress and venues. Get more feedback. Don’t give up.

4. Submit to literary journals, magazines, and blogs.

Use databases like Duotrope to search out venues to submit to for publication of individual poems. Research each venue (read a copy or two) before you submit – this is not only professional courtesy, as you won’t be wasting editors’ time with material totally off base, but also heightens your chances of getting accepted. There really is no shortcut to this step.

5. Honesty is the best policy.

If a venue or contest says no simultaneous submissions, don’t double submit. Don’t enter previously published work in new contests. Even if you get away with it, it’s not a good idea. Your reputation is the most important thing about your professionalism. Don’t ruin it. Word gets around.

6. Don’t let your poetry expire.

This is just my opinion, but with individual poems, don’t worry about starting from the top. The wonderful thing about poems is that they’re short. You’ll never run out, and it’s much easier to work your way up than down. Small venues lead to publication credits that make it easier to be accepted at big venues. That being said, don’t submit to a venue that you would be ashamed to put on your resume.

7. Learn and experiment with both traditional forms and free verse, even if it’s not your thing.

Why limit the number of potential weapons in your arsenal? You’ll never know until you try.

8. Keep it fresh.

There are some things that have been done so many times they’ve become trite. Try to avoid writing about these topics:

love
fear
hate
war
poverty
passion
flowers
childhood
death
history
society
environmental issues
politics

I’m not saying you can’t discuss these things. For example, there is nothing wrong with love poems. But to keep it fresh, don’t talk about Love with a capital “L.” Make it specific – a story or minute detail that will stick with the reader and whisper your message instead of shout it. And occasionally, of course, it’s fine to include broader poems in your collections, but don’t expect them to be published as stand-alone pieces unless they’re really fresh.

9. “Playing to the judges” is really just improving your poetry.

I’ve judged a few poetry contests, and I critique poetry regularly. Editors are essentially judging your poetry as well. Is it good enough to appear in their publication? Here’s how I evaluate a poem – the things I look for:

• Emotional honesty. Does it “ring true”? Am I left feeling like someone just told me a powerful secret?
• Skill. Just like all arts, there needs to be some level of raw talent.
• Originality, also known as “freshness.” See #8.
• Content. Is the subject matter interesting?
• Cleverness/turn of phrase (part of skill).
• Professionalism/presentation. Is it free of typos and misspellings? Does it have standard formatting? (See #2.)
• Accuracy. Is it correct?

• If a poem states that it is a certain form, it needs to actually be that form and adhere to the rules of that form. If it is close to a form but not quite, label it a “___(form name)___ variation.” (I.e.: villanelle variation.) Also, you can’t just call a love poem a sonnet. A sonnet is a form with a specific rhyme scheme and meter requirements. A ballad is not just a poem that “tells a story.” It is actually a form. And you can’t enter a rhymed poem in a free verse category. You will be disqualified. Know these things before you submit.
• It drives me crazy when a poem uses a rhymed word pronounced incorrectly. When in doubt, look it up.
• If you have any checkable facts in your work, check them. I’ve read beautiful poems that have incorrect info as the basis. No one will want to publish that, because they’ll get 100 letters pointing out the mistake.

Best of luck, happy writing, and don’t give up.

Posted in Advice for Poets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

My Advice to Poets, Part I- Getting Started

Originally posted on May 9, 2011 at 11:26 AM

1. Decide why you are writing (or want to write) poetry.

There are many reasons: as an emotional outlet, to be heard, to become well-known, to get paid, to be respected in the poetry community, to flex creative muscles, as therapy, for pleasure… All of these are worthy motives, and all of them have different “rules.” The advice I’m giving here is based predominantly on getting published/going pro. It’s important that you remember that. If you’re writing for the sake of getting feelings down – almost like a diary – who cares if you get it critiqued? That’s not the point; there’d be no reason to. I know that. So for the record, I’m just addressing people with goals similar to mine in this post.

2. Read & attend readings.

You can’t expect to be read if you don’t read. You can’t expect to be known if you don’t get out there. Plus, surrounding yourself with poetry opens you to it more, and you’ll find yourself being more prolific and more inspired.

3. Join a poetry organization (that doesn’t critique) first.

Don’t decide you’re going to start doing this incredibly emotional thing and then jump into the mosh-pit. Find a supportive community that doesn’t tear people down or make them feel inferior. Grow your confidence, find poet friends, and use this early time to build your voice.

4. Then join a critique group.

Critiquing poetry is just as important as critiquing prose. If you’re really serious about going pro and finding publication (after you’ve got step 3 down pat), you need a trustworthy partner or group to give you feedback. If you can’t find a critique group, start one.

5. Never be afraid to write a poem.

Seriously. Never hesitate. The worst that can happen is it sucks, you tear it up, and no one ever sees it. No harm, no foul. The best that can happen? It’s awesome. Don’t let fear talk you out of doing things you want to do. That includes writing poetry.

6. Don’t ever, EVER be ashamed of your early work.

Going along with #5, keep in mind that everyone starts somewhere. When you’ve outgrown your early talent, the lure is strong to look back and mock your first attempts. But don’t. The courage to try is enough to be proud of. That being said, know what writing level you’re at. Don’t step too far beyond your bounds. More on publication and venues on Wednesday.

7. Consider carefully before posting your own poetry on your blog/website.

This practice, like self-publishing novels, can and sometimes does work (in fact, I have found several that do), but it often doesn’t. The temptation to write a poem and stuff it on your blog is too high. If you’re going pro (see #1), you should critique and edit your poetry before publication, including the internet. Slapping up new stuff prevents that, and once it’s up, it’s up. Things on the interwebs never go away. Plus, putting it on your own blog (before it’s published) prevents you from building publication credits with that work, because most venues don’t accept previously published work. So don’t shoot yourself in the foot by putting every poem you’ve ever written online. Choose a select few as samples, and only put up the others as they’ve been published and the rights have reverted back to you.

8. Try to avoid perpetuating these myths.

9. Have fun, experiment, and never stop creating.

Posted in All Things Poetry Series | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On Writing Fixed-Form Poems

Originally posted on May 6, 2011 at 9:10 AM

Today’s guest post courtesy of J. Paul Holcomb, “The Poet from Double Oak.”

I wrote my first poem in high school, but I had no idea what I was doing. I was a first-year journalism student in my junior year, and our journalism teacher was teaching us how to write editorials. We had an assignment to write our first editorial, and I had a brainstorm. I would write mine in verse. I had never written a poem, but figured I would do a rhyming editorial and it would be brilliant. Robert W. Service was my poetic hero in those years so I figured I would try to write my editorial in imitation of the Service style. His poems seemed so natural that it would be a snap.

Well, it wasn’t and when I read the results of my effort, I considered the poem to be unbelievably bad. But luck was with me. The homework was due the next day, on a Tuesday and it was Student Council day. I was a member of the Student Council and it met during my journalism class. It often lasted most of the period, and if it didn’t that day I could walk through the halls slowly, stop at every restroom on the way, then drop into my journalism class just before the bell rang and place the editorial on my teacher’s desk. I would have my assignment turned in on time and would have no fear of suffering the embarrassment of having it read in front of the class.

It never occurred to me that my teacher would like the poem, but that’s what happened. The school paper was handled by second-year journalism students, and no first year efforts were included in the paper unless they were considered outstanding. To my horror, my teacher liked my poem so well that it ended up in the paper the next week. I refused to read my editorial once the paper came out and luckily none of my friends commented on it, at least not to me. Once I did look at it on the printed page, I decided it wasn’t as bad as I thought, but the poem made it into none of my high school scrapbooks.

I didn’t write another poem until I was a senior in college, and my next poems were almost as unlikely as the first. I was a Math major and wanted to minor in Business since I was interested in Statistics and the Business Department offered the only Statistics course at my small Liberal Arts college. I decided, however, on that minor too late to complete the minor without either going to summer school or taking more than four years to complete my degree. Not too academically oriented, I chose to get special permission to take the Statistics course without the Business prerequisites since I was a Math major. That plan worked well, but I still needed a minor. Since I already had twelve hours in English, I decided on an English minor.

I ended up loving my minor and during my last semester before graduating, I took a Creative Writing course. I had developed an interest in poetry and thought this would be a good opportunity to find out more about the craft. I loved the course, but the poetry portion of the course held surprises I wasn’t expecting. I expected to find out techniques for writing good free verse, but I didn’t expect to find out anything about poetic forms. After all, it was free verse that was relevant, wasn’t it?

I was delighted to learn of sonnets. My literature profs talked of sonnets, but none ever described the requirements for sonnets. One of my Creative Writing texts showed me those requirements, as well as the definitions and requirements of all forms within my awareness as well as fixed forms beyond my awareness. I was fascinated. I took the definitions and descriptions of the forms and began to try to find examples of the forms in use. Since I was also taking a course in Romantic Literature I took my text and explored the forms used by Byron, Keats, Shelley and Wordsworth. How fortunate that was since on my Romantics final I was asked to compare the versification of Byron and Shelley. I just played back the results of my search for examples. That’s probably the one time in my under-grad experience that I blew away my prof with an answer on a finals question.

Now that I knew what a sonnet was, my goal was to write a publishable sonnet. I figured if I could get a sonnet into print I would have arrived as a poet. When the school literary magazine put out its call for submissions, I submitted a couple of free verse efforts, my first sonnet, and a poem that I considered a ditty not worthy of the magazine but a poem my prof seemed to like.

When the magazine came out, I was pleased to find that one of the free verse poems was printed and won an honorable-mention prize. The sonnet also made the book, but it wasn’t a prize winner. To my surprise, my ditty was published as the book’s second-place winner. I obviously was not skilled at recognizing poetic quality.

I go into all this because Annie asked me to talk about the importance of form poetry. Through the years I have come to understand why forms appeal to me. I believe it has to do with my left brain. For me I think I work with my right brain when I am working with free verse and with the left when I am working the rigors of forms. Put another way, I spent my working career as a software engineer. I believe the forms speak to the engineering side of my brain, the math major lobe.

All I know for sure is that when I create a form poem, the satisfaction is different from the satisfaction of creating a free verse poem.

On a more practical level, knowledge of the forms gives the poet a fuller tool box from which to create one’s work. I don’t think in rhyme. I don’t think in meter. When I am creating a poem though and working from some sort of inspiration, I often experience occasions when I realize this inspiration calls for a villanelle, perhaps, or maybe a sonnet. Sometimes I will see something as a triolet or a minute. These instances seem always to lead to a poem that ends up being published, poems that would have never been on the printed page had I not been aware of the forms. You can sometimes change the line breaks on a sonnet and end up with an attractive, publishable poem, and when that happens with me I end up with the same “aha” experience that results when I publish a form poem.

I believe a poet limits himself/herself when he/she has no awareness of our rich heritage of poetic forms. I also believe to write only form poems is self-limiting. Writing poetry has added unexpected satisfaction to my life. As C.S. Lewis would say, I have been “Surprised by Joy.” The joy would have been diminished immeasurably had I limited myself to either free verse or fixed forms.

* * *

From the get-go, Paul’s knowledge, generous spirit, and fantastic sense of humor (and balance) have made him a mentor of mine. Paul first introduced me to experimenting with traditional poetic forms, for which I am inexpressibly grateful. He is always there to share my triumphs, give me advice, and teach me new things about what it means to be a poet. He has undoubtedly impacted my poetry career for the better.

Paul’s prize-winning poems have been published in numerous journals and anthologies. His first book of poems, Love, or Something Like it, was a prize winner of the Lucidity Chapbook Book Award from Bear House Publishing in 1997. His most recent book of poems, Looking for Love in the Telecom Corridor, won The Edwin M. Eakin Memorial Book Publication Award and was published by Eakin Press. Paul is a past president of the Poetry Society of Texas, and winner of PST’s Hilton Ross Greer Outstanding Service Award. He has also been an officer for the National Federation of State Poetry Societies and is a past president of Fort Worth Poetry Society. For years Paul wrote a column on poetry, “Discussing Poetic Forms with the Poet from Double Oak,” first for Fort Worth Poet, and then for DFW Poetry Review. His columns also appeared regularly in Poet’s Forum Magazine. Paul also taught writing for years to students in the Dallas Independent School District for the Writer’s Garret “Writers in the Schools” (WITS) program. Recently Paul served as a Community Voice for the Dallas Morning News. A retired software engineer, Paul lives with his wife, Sue Ann, (plus three dogs and two cats) in Double Oak, Texas.

Posted in Guest Posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

Suggested Reading for both LOVERS and HATERS of Poetry

Originally posted on May 4, 2011 at 1:40 PM

This post is going to be short and sweet, for two reasons. 1) People who hate poetry will think looking up even their 4 poets is a chore, and 2) even people who love poetry will be busy with these epic (read: long) poems I’ve lined up for them!

So without further ado, suggested reading:

For People Who HATE Poetry

1. Shel Silverstein: start with A Light in the Attic
1. down to earth, simple, fun, easy – for kids and adults alike
2. Billy Collins: start with The Art of Drowning
1. down to earth, beautiful, contemporary – for adults
3. Dr. Seuss: start with Green Eggs and Ham
1. silly, rhymed, fun, easy – for kids (but loved by adults everywhere)
4. T.S. Eliot’s Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats
1. silly, rhymed, fun, bizarre – for lovers of cats (basis of the musical Cats)

For People Who LOVE Poetry

1. “The Wasteland,” by T.S. Eliot*
1. dark, wonderfully depressing, and bleak, with enough allusions to keep you busy for a year
2. “The Bridge,” by Hart Crane
1. the exact antithesis (in message) to Eliot, considered by many to be the greatest American epic
3. “Paradise Lost,” by John Milton
1. composed in blank-verse, old-timey, and beautifully written, this epic might make you rethink your preconceptions about the story of Adam and Eve
4. “The Iliad/The Odyssey,” by Homer
1. translated over and over again into English from the original Greek, these are classics that require a study guide but are well worth the effort

Find yourself somewhere between love and hate? Try suggested readings here, here, and here.

Happy reading!

*Don’t be misled by Eliot appearing on each list. Most of his work belongs solely to those who adore poetry and want to work for it; The Book of Practical Cats is a strange misfit that is completely unlike any of his other poetic works.

Posted in Advice for Poets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lyrics and Poetry

Originally posted on April 29, 2011 at 2:15 PM

I think we’ve all said (or at least heard people say) things along the line of, “It was music to my ears,” and, “Pure poetry,” often even in the same breath. The use of these two phrases in such a similar way imply a mental connection between lyrics and poetry. But at the same time, the very existence of the two words proves that they also hold distinct differences, much like the words “horror” and “terror.” Otherwise, why have both?

Clearly, this discussion of the similarities and differences of lyrics and poetry will be unavoidably one-sided, as I am a poet and not a musician. I will, however, try my best to make the conversation fair and thoughtful. If you’re on the other side of things and see something I missed, please jump in!

Dictionary.com defines “bard” as “(formerly) a person who composed and recited epic or heroic poems, often while playing the harp, lyre, or the like.” So originally, lyrics and poetry were pretty much the same thing, when you get right down to it – words spoken, sung, or chanted to music. But now, in my perspective, the biggest divide is oral/aural vs. visual.

When books became prevalent with the advent of the printing press, poetry gradually became more of a written form while lyrics retained their oral tradition. Over time, poetry has become almost entirely dependent upon the page (or these days, computer screen), despite poetry enthusiasts’ best efforts (slam poetry, podcasts online, and traveling poets). Meanwhile, lyrics to music are almost solely heard these days; one has to look up lyrics if he/she wants to read along. With digital music’s near-destruction of the physical CD, we don’t even have easy access to CD-case booklets with printed lyrics anymore.

What does this mean for poets and lyricists? Well, for one thing, it means poets have begun to put more importance on the visual aspect of the words on the page. Free verse has experimented with spacing, word shapes, and alignment. Shape poems and word art have cropped up and gained in popularity. Line length and punctuation have taken on more importance than ever. All because we poets now know that the vast majority of our audience will never hear our voice; they will only read our words. And as for lyricists, I can’t quite fathom the change, if there is one. Maybe in composition? Less writing down and more singing different things aloud to see if they “work”? I would argue that poetry has made the greater deviation here, as lyrics have always been sung first and written later.

Poets and lyricists – switching to the artists here, rather than the art – have a lot in common as well. Both are abundant, consisting of everyone from novices practicing their hobbies to experts getting paid the big bucks. Music is definitely more popular. I imagine that the music industry makes at least 100 times the profit of the poetry industry, if not more. Both are quite hard to break into, and are usually done for the love of the craft. Both are artistic endeavors that require a considerable amount of natural skill, dedication, and practice.

Do successful lyricists ever not know how to write music? I don’t know. I know there is crossover, and it must at least sometimes be successful, although I can’t think of an example off the top of my head. (Can anyone think of a popular song that started off as a poem, or vice versa?) I used to write lyrics before I realized that without knowing how to write the music to go with them, they were… well… poems with too many repeating stanzas. lol. And I know from Jewel as an example that not all lyricists (no matter how fabulous – and I do love Jewel) can convert to good poets. So what is it that makes the two crafts different?

They both employ rhyme. Lyrics tend to employ more slant rhyme (also known as near rhyme), because when you’re listening you worry less about full rhyme than when you’re reading. Assonance is very popular in music, whereas consonance is preferred in most forms of poetry. But there are two big differences that I can think of.

1) Song writing requires more skill sets (before you stone my house: please note that I said skill sets, not skills. I truly believe that musicians and poets are equally skilled.) In other words, poets don’t have to know how to write or read music, play instruments, or sing. (I’m also not talking about knowledge. Both fields require their own sets of knowledge. For example, most lyricists probably don’t know most of this.)

2) Poetry – at least form poetry – requires more knowledge and adherence to the rules of rhyme, meter, line length, etc. For example, a lyricist can stretch one word out to cover five syllables so that their end rhyme falls in just the right place. They can choose to emphasize a certain word or syllable to get their point across. They can also skew the pronunciation of words so that non-rhyming words suddenly sound rhymed. Written poets really can’t do that – and if we do, most other poets would call it “cheating.” In that way, it seems that poetry is more demanding. (Also worth noting: the music behind the words greatly affects the lyrics. Poetry can’t rely on music to set a tone or provide a contrast, but lyricists have to take this factor into account as they write.)

Both forms employ repetition, although lyrics tend to repeat whole stanzas (refrains and choruses) while most traditional poetry forms repeat specific lines or phrases. I think the closest place of crossover in today’s American culture is probably with slam poetry (free-verse, sometimes rhymed, spoken with attitude) and rap (which is essentially free-verse, sometimes rhymed, sung or rapped with attitude).

In the end, I suppose the discussion of lyrics vs. poetry is similar to that of literary vs. commercial fiction. You can quibble over wording, argue about blurred lines, and point fingers all you want, but the truth is that they are distinct entities, that they do sometimes cross over, and that this is not a bad thing. We may occasionally struggle to pin down definitions for the two, but one thing remains always and maddeningly true: we know it when we see it.

Are there any artists out there who are equal parts lyricist and poet? I would love to get your take on things. And what do the rest of you think? Am I being obtuse, or is it true that we know the differences between lyrics and poetry even if we struggle to delineate them?

Posted in All Things Poetry Series | Tagged , | 2 Comments